DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for. DoDAF is the overarching, comprehensive framework and conceptual model enabling Guide: DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense that provides structure.

Author: Fenrikinos Mikashakar
Country: Finland
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Video
Published (Last): 12 September 2010
Pages: 454
PDF File Size: 3.8 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.4 Mb
ISBN: 283-9-44886-833-4
Downloads: 59904
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tegore

Many times, these design products were not understandable or useful to their intended audience. The relationship between architecture data elements across the SV to the OV can be exemplified dosaf systems are procured and fielded to support organizations and their operations. Overview Product Offerings Professional Services. The sequence of the artifacts listed below gives a suggested order in which the artifacts could be developed.

While it is clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public and voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of a large number of dpdaf architecture frameworks.

The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions. And what’s more, No Magic fully supports all architectural framework products ensuring you achieve mission results.

Government and Defense

Retrieved from ” https: This page was last edited on 3 Octoberat As illustrated below, the original viewpoints Operational Viewpoint, Systems and Services Viewpoint, Technical Standards Viewpoint, and the All Viewpoint have had their Models reorganized to better address their purposes.

The Operational Viewpoint now can describe rules and constraints for any function business, intelligence, warfighting, etc. The presentational aspects should not overemphasize the pictorial presentation at the expense of the underlying data.

JCIDS process owners have written policy to support architecture requirements i. Systems and services view SV is a set of graphical and textual products that describe systems and services and interconnections providing for, or supporting, DoD functions. The tool automates and assists the process of resource allocation ensuring mission critical project success.

Benefits Improved Mission Results – Your team will do a better job of mining available data, measuring and visualizing architecture and overall success factors resulting in improved mission results. In most cases, an enterprise will capture its routine or repeatable business and mission operations as architectural content. Employing MagicDraw in DoDAF promotes significant improvement in processes, program and people efficiencies as well as shorter cycle times.


For the purposes of architecture development, the term integrated means that data required in more than one of the architectural models is commonly defined and dpdaf across those models. The dodaff Standards Viewpoint can now describe business, commercial, and doctrinal standards, as well as the technical standards applicable to 20. solutions, which may include systems and services. The developing system must not only meet its internal data needs but also those of the operational framework into which it is set.

The Capability Models describe capability taxonomy and capability evolution. These views offer overview and details aimed to specific stakeholders within their domain and in interaction with other domains in which the system will operate.

Otherwise there is the risk of producing products with no customers. For more information or a quote please contact sales nomagic.

By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. It provides guidance and suggestions on how to ensure that other proposed methods can be adapted as needed to meet the DoD requirements for dodxf collection and storage.

Selecting architectural views carefully ensures that they adequately explain the requirement and proposed solution ddodaf ways that will enhance audience understanding.

The architect and stakeholders select views to ensure that the Architectural Descriptions will support current and future states of the process or activity under review. In this manner, the DM2 supports the exchange and reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Coalition partners, thus facilitating the understanding and implementation of interoperability of processes and systems.

The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions. The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format. DoDAF has a meta-model underpinning the framework, defining the types of modelling elements that can be used dkdaf each view and the relationships between them. This document addressed usage, integrated architectures, DoD and Federal policies, value of architectures, architecture measures, DoD decision support processes, development techniques, analytical techniques, and the CADM v1.


The figure represents the information that links the operational view, systems and services view, and technical standards view. Node is a complex, logical concept that is represented with more concrete concepts.

DoDAF Architecting Overview – AcqNotes

As one example, the DoDAF v1. Definitions and Guidelines”, “II: Organized collections of views often representing processes, systems, services, standards, etc.

DoD weapons and information technology system acquisitions are required to develop and document an enterprise architecture EA using the views prescribed in the DoDAF. These key support processes are designed to provide uniform, mandated, processes in critical decision-making areas, supplemented by individual agency operations, defined by Architectural Descriptions tailored to support those decisions-making requirements.

It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community. In addition, a note on system engineering is included.

To facilitate the use of information at the data layer, the DoDAF describes a set of models for visualizing data through graphic, tabular, or textual means. DoD Business Systems Modernization: In addition to graphical representation, there is typically a requirement to provide metadata to the Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository DITPR or other architectural repositories.

Rapidly see and identify data relationships and critical paths. SE processes are applied to allow an orderly progression from one level of development to the next detailed level using controlled baselines.

Teams will find it easier to take the abstract and make it meaningful, and achieve net-centric results.

Department of Defense Architecture Framework – Wikipedia

The tool automates and assists the process of resource allocation ensuring mission critical project success. Program Accountability – Provide Program Manager accountability including the enablement of net-centric processes and architectures, flexibility and responsiveness.

There are many different approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required.